Keaton was sentenced to 20 years in prison for a robbery that he committed ten days prior to the robbery/murder for which he was sentenced to death and 3. he was no longer subject to the death penalty, because of changes in the law 2. The prosecution chose not to re prosecute for a number of good reasons - 1. There is no credible claim for innocence in this case of robbery/murder. Through the testimony of numerous eyewitnesses, Keaton’s numerous confessions, as well as those of co-defendants, Keaton was sentenced to death. Go to pages 40-46 at 3) David Keaton - Keaton’s defense attorney stated that even without Keaton’s numerous confessions, that the eyewitness testimony was likely sufficient to convict Keaton for the capital murder. She eventually pled guilty to two counts of second degree murder and was released for time served, after 16 years. There is no evidence to support a claim of innocence for Jacobs in the murder of two police officers in Florida. The best review of the blatant dishonesty of this “Exonerated” case is “The Myth of Innocence”, Josh Marquis, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, v 95, No 2, Winter, 2005, Northwestern University School of Law. Go toĢ) Sunny Jacobs - After the shooting, still at the scene of the murders, a trooper asked Jacobs: “Do you like shooting troopers?” Jacobs response: “We had to.” Hayes has now been convicted of a nearly identical murder in New York, which was committed prior to the murder in Florida.
Reviews of each case, with links and contacts for your own review.ġ) Robert Earl Hayes Nothing about Hayes’ retrial changes the appeals court’s original observation that evidence existed to establish Hayes’ guilt.
The Exonerated is a true story just as CATS and The Lion King are. This play is presented as a true story of six innocents sent to death row because of corruption within the system. “The Exonerated” – anti truth, anti victim – are any actually innocent?
0 kommentar(er)
